Date published: Dec 2020
SUERF Policy Brief, No 39
by Debora Revoltella and Pedro de Lima
European Investment Bank
Download: SUERF Policy Brief, No 39 (0.76 MB)
The COVID-19 pandemic poses risks, but also an opportunity for Europe’s economy. Lock-downs, sudden drops in demand and widespread uncertainty contributed to a massive shock for European firms. In the short term, such shock could only be countered via substantial policy intervention, both on the monetary and the fiscal front. In the long term, however, Covid-19 is a game changer: it will lead to structural changes in the global economy and most aspects of human life – see, inter alia, Jorda, Singh, and Taylor (2020) and Brookings (2020). It obliges firms to adapt to a “new normal”, which requires more digitalisation, more innovation and updating production settings. Combined to the reconfirmed EU climate ambition, this means a call for a radical shift and, in fact, more investment.
The 5th edition of the EIB Investment Survey, sheds light on the challenges ahead. Large sections of Europe’s economy will remain behind, if they fail to transform. Weakening internal finance and the nature of the required investment call for long-term patient investors – combining equity and patient debt instruments. As traditional SMEs often lack the skills to innovate, more technical assistance and/or advisory is needed, to accompany financial incentives and accelerate re-skilling. Policy support has to evolve as the crisis advances, from liquidity provision to a more targeted push to structural transformation.
The Covid-19 crisis has been a massive shock for European firms.
Despite the massive policy stimulus in the EU, both on the monetary and fiscal front, real GDP is contracting by levels unrivalled since the WWII. An investment slump is underway. Aggregate investment contracted by 19% yoy in Q2 2020, with all components of investment affected – see IMF (2020) and EIB (2021, forthcoming). The COVID-19 crisis will lead to structural changes in the global economy and most aspects of human life – see, inter alia, Jorda, Singh, and Taylor (2020) and Brookings (2020). In this note, we present the results of the 2020 EIB investment survey, detailing the impact of the crisis as felt by European and US corporates at the end of the virus first wave.
The EIB Investment survey (EIBIS) sheds light on the crisis impact on EU firms.
EIBIS is an annual survey, targeting 13,000 EU and US firms, built to be representative for each EU member states, for firms size and sector. At its 5th edition, it was administrated during the Summer of 2020, just at the end of the first wave of lockdowns.
According to EIBIS, in the first half of 2020, 55% of EU firms reduced employment in some ways, via layoff, redundancies, temporarily leaves and working hours, due to Covid-19. Sentiment indicators reveal a substantial deterioration in the economic environment, the regulatory environment and the business prospects. Firms experience deteriorating internal finance, while external finance remains more muted, mostly associated to debt, with liquidity secured via massive public sector guarantee schemes ad liquidity provisions to banks.
Covid-19 is a shock in the short term and a game changer in the medium-long.
In such circumstances, 45% of EU firms say they are investing less due to the pandemic, with investment plans either delayed or abandoned. However, what is even more important, the Covid-19 crisis is a game changer in the medium to long term. Firms foresee the needs to adapt to a “new normal”, post Covid-19. 50% of EU firms say that more investment in digitalisation will be needed because of the pandemic. 40% of firms see a long-term need to adapt their product/services portfolio because of the pandemic. 40% predict an impact on their supply chain. The discrepancy between reducing investment today and need to invest to adapt to the new normal is a clear source of concern.
|Source: EIBIS 2020|
Compared to US firms, EU firms – particularly SMEs – innovate less and lag behind in digitalisation.
According to EIBIS 2020, 37% of EU firms have not adopted any digital technology, vs 26% in the USA. However, innovation and digital adoption has been expanding overtime, with the share of firms which have introduced innovations or implemented at least one digital technology increasing both in the EU and in the US vs EIBIS 2019. Larger firms have higher rates of digital adoption than smaller firms. Only 52% of SME’s in the EU have adopted at least one digital technology, vs 75% among the large firms. The status of digitalisation in the EU parallels that of innovation: 51% of EU firms did not introduced any innovations (products, processes or services) as part of their investment activities, vs. 41% in the US. Larger firms are also more likely to innovate than smaller firms (55% vs 43%).
EU vs US firms – digitalisation and innovation, by size
Source: EIBIS 2020
EU firms risk being left behind.
With investment collapsing, many firms – particularly the smaller – may fail to adapt to the new normal, becoming ever less competitive. Non-digital firms invest less, innovate less and grow less. There is a growing knowledge gap on digitalisation. Firms that haven’t yet invested in digital technology fail to perceive the urgency. Diffusion of digitalization requires awareness of the opportunity and investing in the background infrastructure. Failing to invest, those firms will also be left exposed to the risks posed by the climate transition.
Uncertainty, skills and finance present critical constraints to investment.
Long term barriers to investment
Source: EIBIS 2020
Action is needed at a critical juncture.
Brookings (2020), “Reimagining the global economy: Building back better in a post-COVID-19 world,” Available at https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Reimagining-Global-Economy.pdf
EIB (2021), “Investment Report 2020/2021: Towards a Smart and Green Europe, in the Covid-19 era.” EIB, Luxembourg (forthcoming).
IMF (2020), “Global Prospects and Policies.” Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Jorda, O., S. R. Singh, and A. M. Taylor. 2020. "Longer-Run Economic Consequences of Pandemics," Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2020-09. Available at https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2020-09.
About the authors
Debora Revoltella is the Director of the Economics Department of the European Investment Bank. The Department provides impact-driven economic analysis to support the EIB in its policy and strategy definition and in its operations, with a team of some 40 economists. The main publications include the EIB Annual Report on Investment and Investment Finance in Europe, regular Economic Notes on structural issues concerning the European economy, publications on the state of the banking sector of the different regions of operations of the EIB as well as the EIB Report on Results, which assesses the development impact of projects financed by the EIB. Since 2016, the Department in also in charge of the new EIB Survey on Investment and Investment Finance, targeting 12,000 European firms each year. Before joining the EIB, Debora was the Chief Economist for Central and Eastern Europe in UniCredit, managing a team of some 45 economists in the CESEE region. She holds a degree in Economics and a Master in Economics from Bocconi University as well as a PhD in Economics from the University of Ancona in Italy. Debora is a member of the SUERF Council of Management, a member of the EURO50 scientific board and a member of the Steering Committee of the Vienna Initiative and an alternate member of the Board of the Joint Vienna Institute.
Pedro J. F. de Lima is Head of Economic Studies in the Economics Department of the European Investment Bank, responsible for the analysis of structural topics relevant for European economies and the activities of the EIB. He is in charge of the EIB’s Annual Report on Investment and Investment Finance as well as of the EIB Group Survey on corporate investment across the EU. Previously, he was Head of the Country and Financial Sector Division in the Economics Department and Head of the Internal Modelling Division in the Risk Management Directorate. Prior to joining the EIB, Pedro worked as senior economist with the OECD in Paris and the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, and was Associate Professor of Economics at the Johns Hopkins University, USA. He holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA and has various publications encompassing Macroeconomics, Financial Economics, Labour Economics, and Time Series Econometrics. He has also been an Adjunct Professor of Economics at the John F. Welch College of Business, Sacred Heart University (Luxembourg campus) teaching courses on Derivatives and Risk Management.
SUERF Policy Briefs (SPBs) serve to promote SUERF Members’ economic views and research findings as well as economic policy-oriented analyses. They address topical issues and propose solutions to current economic and financial challenges. SPBs serve to increase the international visibility of SUERF Members’ analyses and research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the institution(s) the author(s).
Editorial Board: Ernest Gnan, Frank Lierman, David T. Llewellyn, Donato Masciandaro, Natacha Valla.
SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum
A-1090 Vienna, Austria
www.suerf.org • firstname.lastname@example.org